What growth means, why giving out aid is tricky – and how this all relates to our daily lives

“The Elusive Quest for Growth –
Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics”
by W. Easterly
ISBN: 0262550423
Review by: Pamela Ravasio, Editor
“People respond to incentives [, all the rest is commentary.]” - taken from the book “The Armchair Economist”, this quote is the official motto of this insightful primer about 40 years of (failed) development aid efforts.
Simply put, an economy prospers if the incentives are “right”, meaning: it results in both, personal financial and non-financial benefits, for the majority of the participating individuals. The right incentives lead to individuals and groups investing into their, and therefore the country’s, future.
What does this mean concretely? For instance, education is an investment into the future of an individual, its family, its social group. However, education is only of interest, if the individual receiving the education will obtain some clear benefits in return to his or her investment (time, money) made in order to obtain the education. Access to skilled work and hence to an appropriately higher salary is one type of benefit, social recognition is yet another type of attractive pay off.
If a majority of individuals does not believe in being able to obtain any benefit from their efforts and investments, the economy will stagnate or decline. In our example this means that, if an individual is bound to either not find employment despite educational efforts, or alternatively only unskilled or underpaid employment, education is not an attractive prospect.
In short, the lack of expected future benefit (pay off) will influence individuals’ choice of whether or not gain eduction.
Education is but one example of how the concept “people respond to incentives” works. Industrial investments, family planning, voting in elections and many, many other examples are mentioned and explained in detail throughout the book.
In the first part of the book, with “people respond to incentives” at heart, the author analyses all major panaceas, or vogues, of public aid programs of the past decades, which effectively lead to debt overload of developing nations in some cases, to even more corruption in others, and to less competitive economies over all: Aid for industrial investment, aid to improve education, aid to foster population control, aid as a means to pressure governments into policy reforms, and finally relieving debt while giving out more aid. For each of these panaceas the statistics suggest that, while well intended, the efforts were at the bottom line not entirely thought trough, and have overall done more ill than good for those who were the focus of attention: the individuals that just wait for the one opportunity to get a go at climbing out of their poverty pit.
With the first part dedicated to the flaws of policies and attempts past, the second half addresses those factors that remain a central challenge to get the incentives right for (potentially) successful aid giving: social phenomena such as poverty traps and polarisation between factions (incl. wars), as well as governments that kill economies through bad policies and /or corruption. And a ray of hope comes hand-in-hand with a warning: top edge technologies, with high-capacity broadband data network at their core, contain a tremendous potential and a risk. On the one hand, they could be the final tomb stone to poor economies. On the other hand, they may well be the device to leapfrog out of a vicious circle thanks to comparatively (to non-high-tech) lower infrastructure cost combined with a wider versatility for profitable use.
The chapters on corruption and conflicts are particularly insightful and relevant. First of all, the two aspects are to some degree interlinked. Second, they make clear that corruption is by no ways only a phenomenon of developing economies, but that also in developed economies ways and measures were found of infiltrating public and private mechanism with corruption to one degree or another.
Finally, it becomes apparent that a shy look into today’s newspapers suggests that in reality, industrialised countries (read: also the UK) face many of the same type of challenges in their internal policies as developing nations do. It is a fact that public debt is currently high throughout the developed world (UK: interest paid on public debt is higher than investments on either education or the armed forces). Further, the quality of public service is ailing, and rapidly decreasing. Examples? Postal and transport network strikes despite competitive salaries paid, ailing infrastructure and quality in the healthcare systems despite the system’s overall crippling costs.
Research agrees that high public debt combined with low quality public service is directly linked with high incident rate of corruption on the one hand and low / decreasing economic growth and hence a flagging economy on the other (and as a consequence, lower incomes, more unemployed, …). Maybe, the developed and the developing world are not so far apart after all – and will be much closer still in the future.
This book is an excellent introduction to the macro-economics behind development and global aid giving. But beyond this, it also offers insights into a much broader range of mechanisms that are directly applicable to the problems and challenges encountered in developed economies, too, specifically in the aftermaths of the recent economic downturn. Sadly, the implications of the explanations suggest that, in reality, the current downturn – and possibly slight recovery – are but the introduction to a potentially much harsher future, unless not only the developing world, but certainly also the traditional donor countries review their status-quo substantially.


I haven’t read the book, but this review doesn’t appear to mention that developed nations intentionally use aid/etc as a means to intentionally cripple/exploit other nations, or that “unfortunate” events such as the great depression (and/or the current global economic meltdown) were intentionally caused/orchestrated by the ruling elite as a means to enslave even those people lucky enough to live in “developed”/wealthy countries.
The future does indeed appear bleaker for most of us, but not for the ultra wealthy by any stretch of the imagination.
I agree with subpixel.
In addition, it needs to be recognised that the development formula, borrow > invest > recoup > repay, does not apply to development — even in developed countries. The colossal public debt with which all countries are burdened testifies to this.
Something is very wrong at the foundation of our understanding of real world economics.
First of all - thanks lots for your comments! It’s great to know that there critical people out there, who take this problematic issue seriously, and official positions with a grain of salt!
The book actually does address both of your mentioned points - but it also makes a point of providing hard, provable facts of what is/went wrong.
The author btw. used to work at the World Bank, and hence was at the source and part of many of the decisions, that he himself admits to having failed. As things go, he got fired when this book appeared
To subpixels comment - this book makes it very clear that each donor country has got its down agenda when it comes to giving out aid. Whether or not this is intended to cripple developing nations, is - unfortunatelly - not provable by statistics. This is why the author has not dwelved into this topic in detail, although he does mention some of the paradoxes stemming from public policies.
To Janos comment - one of the main points this book makes, is precisely that in the process of giving out aid - or spending taxes, for that matter - , basics of economics (economics 101, if you want) have been deliberately ignored. To a degree that, indeed, one could argue that it is precisely here that the intention to cripple developing nations becomes apparent.
I do agree that this is certainly and without any doubt, only one aspect of the entire problem. BThe value of the book lays in that it shows how the current mechanisms work, showing that it is often largely in a dimension removed from politics but more akin to bureaucracy. The book itself is merely a piece of the puzzle to have well informed discussions on the whole larger picture.
Leave a comment!
21st Century Network: Events Archive & Reports »
Report: “Race and Difference in the 21st Century” (14/01/2010 meetup)
London is often cited as the most ethnically diverse city in the world, priding itself as a place where every ethnic community is encouraged to retain their own identity. But for some ethnic diversity can …
Activists' Events »
TEDx London: ‘Technology, Entertainment & Design’ with a local flavour
Report on the 2nd TEDx London Event on 02/12/2009
By: Pamela Ravasio, Editor
TED stands for Technology, Education and Design, and is, in its own words, “a small non-profit devoted to Ideas Worth Spreading”. The TED …
Articles »
Aching and Learning
This is the first of a monthly column in collaboration with the Sock Mob and reporters from the streets of London.
By: Ian Mason, Reporter from the Street
The fast began at five, breakfast had been taken …
Book Reviews »
Love the children of all species for all time
“Cradle to Cradle – re-making the way we make things”
by M. Braungart and W. McDonough
ISBN: 0099535475
Review by: Pamela Ravasio, Editor
“When you do something wrong, don’t try improve upon it.” Instead, the ‘cradle to cradle’ …
Focus »
What came out of Copenhagen - and what does it mean for the most vulnerable?
The highly anticipated UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen ended with a fraudulent last minute agreement, engineered by the United States, using China, backed by Brazil, India and African Nations as cover-up. What exactly contains …
News »
21st Century Network on LinkedIn
LinkedIn is the world’s largest professional network with over 50 million members and growing rapidly. LinkedIn connects you to your trusted contacts and helps you exchange knowledge, ideas, and opportunities with a broader network …
Profiles »
Mark Barrett: Campaign For Real Democracy
Mark Barrett originally trained as a lawyer. An eye-opening stint in the City triggered the decision to travel the world, and after years of cultural research across the globe, and a decade’s work as a …
21st Century Network
Meta
Our Rapid Growth
Our Social Network
Visit 21st Century Network
Follow Us On Twitter
Twitter Updates
follow me on Twitter
21st Century Network Sites
Archive
Blogroll
Technorati Profile
Click here to check out
The 21st Century Network!
Tag Cloud
child labou child labour children china Climate Change CSR debate democracy development Fair Trade film globalisation green living humanism human rights LinkedIn markets meeting migration politics Profiles refugees religion Social action social business social enterprise sustainability Trade Justice trafficking X LinkedIn